<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hand-building Media Lists: Media Relations 101 Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carltonprmarketing.com/public-relations/hand-building-media-lists-media-relations-101-part-1/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carltonprmarketing.com/public-relations/hand-building-media-lists-media-relations-101-part-1</link>
	<description>Integrated Public Relations, Marketing and Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 21:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelley Kassa</title>
		<link>http://www.carltonprmarketing.com/public-relations/hand-building-media-lists-media-relations-101-part-1/comment-page-1#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelley Kassa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carltonprmarketing.com/?p=779#comment-289</guid>
		<description>All great points Bobbie.  

I&#039;d add a somewhat controversial point.  Invest the time -- and sometimes that means lots of time -- building a great media list.  

Why? Most importantly, you&#039;ll get those editors and reporters who may not come up in a basic keyword search.  Secondly, you won&#039;t be wasting time pitching the wrong reporters.

Some people disagree with this. They prefer just relying on the large list generated by the PR database and pitch away even if not appropriate.  IMO, time and client money is wasted by this approach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All great points Bobbie.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d add a somewhat controversial point.  Invest the time &#8212; and sometimes that means lots of time &#8212; building a great media list.  </p>
<p>Why? Most importantly, you&#8217;ll get those editors and reporters who may not come up in a basic keyword search.  Secondly, you won&#8217;t be wasting time pitching the wrong reporters.</p>
<p>Some people disagree with this. They prefer just relying on the large list generated by the PR database and pitch away even if not appropriate.  IMO, time and client money is wasted by this approach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

